This post is based upon my reading of a section of Chapter 2 of Arnold’s ODE.
Recall: given a vector field on
, it is uniquely associated with the differential operator
, i.e. the operator that differentiates a function
along
.
Definition: we say that is a first integral of
if
.
It is obvious that the first integrals of are solutions of the corresponding PDE
and vice versa.
Notice that there are 2 relatively obvious, yet geometrically important, properties that can be taken as equivalent definitions for first integrals:
is constant along the characteristics (i.e. the phase curves) of
.
- Each characteristic belongs to one and only one of the level sets of
>
Example: Let’s look at the vector field on given by:
This corresponding differential operator is given by .
The phase curves are the set of rays emanating from the origin and the origin itself:

The first integrals of this vector field are constant along each ray and continuous on . This means that all the first integrals are constant on
, i.e. the set of solutions for the PDE
is the set of constant functions.
Note: we can apply similar argument to show that in a neighbourhood of a limit cycle, all first integrals are constant. This is because a phase curve passing through a point in a small neighbourhood of a limit cycle converges to the cycle as . Since a first integral must be constant on the phase curves and is continuous on
, the value of the first integral on any of the phase curves close enough to the cycle must be the same as the value of the first integral on the limit cycle.
Problem: For which k does the system of equations ,
on
have a non-constant first integral?
The phase curves for this vector field are given by:
When , the phase curves consist a set of ‘curvilinear’ rays emanating from the origin and the origin itself. Again, we can argue by continuity that the first integrals must be constant.

When k = 0, the phase curves are the set of rays parallel to the axis. The function
is a non-constant first integral of this vector field.
When , the phase curves are no longer rays emanating from the origin. In fact, most of them reach infinity within finite time.

For k = -1, the curves are the branches of the hyperbolas and
, where
, and the origin. A non-constant first integral would be
.
In fact, for all , there exists non-constant first integrals. How do we find a solution for a general
value?
The better question would be: given the phase curves, how do we find the first integrals? i.e. how are the first integrals of related to the solutions for
?
Example: Given .
The corresponding vector field is:
And the phase curves are given by .
What are the first integrals ?
Key observation: If is a first integral, then
for all
. It is easy to see that one such function is
. And all functions of
also satisfy.
Theorem (I will write the proof in the following post):
There exists a neighbourhood of of
(where
is a non-singular point) such that in
,
has n-1 functionally independent first integrals:
and any first integral of the equation is a function of
Since the vector field does not have any singular points, it follows that the set of functions of
is the set of solutions to the PDE.
What about when the vector field has a singular point?
For instance, are all the first integrals of on
functions of
?
No. Arnold claimed that there exists a solution for which . How can we find such a solution?
Leave a Reply