I have learned from class that if E/F is a finite normal extension, then given \alpha, \beta \in E with the same minimal polynomial, there exists \Psi \in Aut_{F}(E) such that \Psi(\alpha) = \beta.

Sketch Proof:

Since \alpha, \beta have the same minimal polynomial, it follows that F(\alpha) \cong F[x]/<p(x)> \cong F(\beta). Hence, we can find an isomorphism \theta: F(\alpha) \rightarrow F(\beta) such that \theta|_{F} = id. BECAUSE of the fact that E is a finite normal extension of F, it is the splitting field of some f(x) \in F[x]. We can in turn also think of E as the splitting field of f(x) \in F(\alpha) and also F(\beta). Thus, we can find an automorphism \Psi: E \rightarrow E that extends \theta. Hence, we have what we want.

Now, the question is: what goes wrong when E/F is NOT a finite normal extension?

Can we find a field extension E such that there exist \alpha, \beta \in E that share the SAME minimal polynomial, but we cannot find \Psi \in Aut_F(E) such that \Psi(\alpha) = \beta?

Yes, take E = Q(\sqrt[4]{2}). The minimal polynomial of \sqrt[4]{2} is f(x) = x^4 -2 = (x-\sqrt[4]{2})(x+\sqrt[4]{2})(x-i\sqrt[4]{2})(x+i\sqrt[4]{2}). Hence, Q(\sqrt[4]{2}) is not normal.

Take \sqrt{2} \in Q(\sqrt[4]{2}). Notice that the minimal polynomial of \sqrt{2} is g(x) = x^2 - 2 = (x-\sqrt{2})(x+\sqrt{2}). And so, \sqrt{2}, -\sqrt{2} are conjugate. But we claim there does not exist \Psi \in Aut_Q(Q(\sqrt[4]{2})) such that \Psi(\sqrt{2}) = -\sqrt{2}. Suppose not. Then for such \Psi, we have \Psi(\sqrt[4]{2})^2 = \Psi(\sqrt{2}) = -\sqrt{2}. This means \Psi(\sqrt[4]{2}) = \sqrt[4]{-2}, but this is not in Q(\sqrt[4]{2}), a contradiction.

Leave a Reply

Is this your new site? Log in to activate admin features and dismiss this message
Log In