By definition,

SU(2) = \{ \begin{bmatrix} \alpha & \beta \\ -\overline{\beta} & \overline{\alpha} \end{bmatrix} : \alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{C}, |\alpha|^2 + |\beta|^2 = 1 \}.

Alternatively, we can write each matrix A \in SU(2) as

\begin{bmatrix} a + bi & -c + di \\ c + di & a - bi \end{bmatrix} where a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 = 1.

Thus, we have a bijective map from S^3 \rightarrow SU(2), given by:

a + bi + cj + dk \mapsto \begin{bmatrix} a + bi & -c + di \\ c + di & a - bi \end{bmatrix}.

It is easy to see that this map is smooth, and so, as a manifold SU(2) \cong S^3.

Claim: this map is not only a diffeomorphism between manifolds, but it is also a group isomorphism between the groups SU(2) and S^3.

Proof: Recall quaternion multiplication: Let q = a + bi + cj + dk and p = x + yi + zj + wk. Then,

qp = (ax - by - cz - dw) + (ay + bx + cw - dz)i + (az - bw + cx + dy)j + (aw + bz - cy + dx)k.

The corresponding matrices for q and p in SU(2) are given by:

q \mapsto Q = \begin{bmatrix} a + bi & c + di \\ -c + di & a - bi \end{bmatrix}

p \mapsto P = \begin{bmatrix} x + yi & z + wi \\ -z + wi & x - yi \end{bmatrix}.

It follows that

QP = \begin{bmatrix} (ax - by - cz - dw) + i(ay + bx + cw - dz) & (az - bw + cx + dy) + i(aw + bz - cy + dx) \\ -(az - bw + cx + dy) + i(aw + bz - cy + dx) & (ax - by - cz - dw) - i(ay + bx + cw - dz) \end{bmatrix},

which is exactly the corresponding matrix for qp \in S^3 in SU(2).

Hence, the map from S^3 \rightarrow SU(2) is a group isomorphism. \square

Claim: Every unit quaternion corresponds to a rotation in \mathbb{R}^3.

Proof: We identify \mathbb{R}^3 with the space of purely imaginary quaternions, i.e. \text{Im} \mathbb{H} = \{ bi + cj + dk: b, c, d \in \mathbb{R} \}:

(x, y, z) \leftrightarrow xi + yj + zk

Given q be a unit quaternion. We consider the map:

R_{q} :  \text{Im} \mathbb{H} \rightarrow \text{Im} \mathbb{H} given by

v \mapsto qvq^{-1} for any v \in \text{Im} \mathbb{H}.

It is easy to check that:

  1. qvq^{-1} \in \text{Im} \mathbb{H}
  2. |qvq^{-1}| = |v|

Thus, R_{q} preserves the length of the imaginary quaternions. We now show that the angle is also preserved, i.e. this map preserves the inner product.

Let v, w \in \text{Im} \mathbb{H} \cong \mathbb{R}^3. We want to show that:

R_q(v) \cdot R_q(w) = v \cdot w.

Key: For v, w \in \text{Im} \mathbb{H}, vw = v \cdot w + v \times w. In particular, this means \text{Re}(vw) = v \cdot w.

Thus, to show that R_{q} preserves inner product, it suffices to show that \text{Re}(R_{q}(v) R_{q}(w)) = \text{Re}(vw).

We have R_{q}(v) R_{q}(w) = (qvq^{-1})(qwq^{-1}) = qvwq^{-1} = R_q(vw).

It is easy to check that for any x \in \mathbb{H}, \text{Re}(R_q(x)) = \text{Re}(x). For instance, write x = a + \textbf{x} where \textbf{x} is the purely imaginary part and a \in \mathbb{R}. Then,

qxq^{-1} = q(a + \textbf{x})q^{-1} = qaq^{-1} + q\textbf{x}q^{-1} = a + q\textbf{x}q^{-1}.

Hence, \text{Re}(R_{q} x) = a = \text{Re}(x). Thus, every unit quaternion corresponds to an element of SO(3).

Claim: The map \Psi: S^3 \rightarrow SO(3), \Psi(q) = R_q is a group homomorphism.

It suffices to show that group multiplication is preserved.

Let p, q \in S^3 and v \in \mathbb{R}^3 be arbitrary. Then,

\Psi(pq)v = R_{pq}(v) = (pq)v(pq)^{-1} = p(qvq^{-1})p^{-1} = p(R_q(v))p^{-1} = R_p \circ R_q (v).

This shows that \Psi is a group homomorphism.

Claim: The kernel of \Psi is {1, -1}.

It is easy to see that both 1 and -1 are both mapped to the identity element in SO(3).

Let p be an element in the kernel. Then, for any v \in \mathbb{R}^3, we have:

pvp^{-1} = R_p(v) = v.

Recall: v can be expressed as a purely imaginary quaternion. This means, pv = vp for any purely imaginary quaternion. This is only possible if p \in \mathbb{R}. Since p \in S^3, p \in \{-1, 1 \}.

Thus, \Psi is a double cover from S^3 to SO(3). Since SU(2) \cong S^3, it follows that:

SU(2)/<\pm I> \cong S^3/\{q ~ -q \} \cong SO(3).

Leave a Reply

Is this your new site? Log in to activate admin features and dismiss this message
Log In