This is based upon my reading of the first chapter of Arnold’s PDE.

Key takeaway: in the space of 1-jets, we can view first order PDE’s as algebraic equations, i.e. a first order PDE describes a hypersurface living in this space.

By definition, the space of k-jets of functions of (x_1, ..., x_n) is the space of Taylor polynomials of degree k.

For example, a point in the space of 1-jets is given by (x_1, ..., x_n, y, p_1, ..., p_n). The first n components gives us the point (x_1, ..., x_n) in the domain \mathbb{R}^n. The (n+1)-th component is the value of the function. The last n components (p_1, ..., p_n) gives us the derivative of the function in the direction of x_i, where i = 1, 2, …, n. Each point in the space of 1-jets gives us the first degree Taylor expansion of a function.

In the space of 1-jets, we have an invariantly defined field of 2n-dimensional hyperplanes given by, dy = p \cdot dx. (Note: since this field is a geometric object, it is invariant under change of coordinates, but why does Arnold also say that under a change of coordinates (x, y, p) \mapsto (\tilde{x}, \tilde{y}, \tilde{p}), this field of planes is still given by d\tilde{y} = \tilde{p} \cdot d\tilde{x}?)

Important geometric property of this field of planes in J^1: All tangent planes of all 1-graphs at a given point in J^1 lie in the same hyperplane, dy = p \cdot dx.

Proof: At the point (x_1, ..., x_n, y, p_1, ..., p_n), any tangent vector of the 1-graph of a function u must satisfy dy = \Sigma \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_i} dx_i = \Sigma p_i dx_i (*).

(*) can be explained in the following way:

Let v be a tangent vector of the 1-graph and \gamma(t) = (x(t), y(t), p(t)) be a curve on the 1-graph such that v = \gamma'(0). Since \gamma is a curve on the graph, y(t) = u(x(t)).

Using the chain rule, we have: \frac{dy}{dt} = \Sigma \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_i} dx_i. By definition of the space of 1-jets, \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_i} = p_i. \square

Think about: In J^1(\mathbb{R}^n, \mathbb{R}), what are the n-planes in the hyperplanes (dim. 2n) of the contact structure that cannot be tangent planes of a 1-graph?

For n = 1, at the point (x_0, y_0, p_0), this would be the line given by x = x_0 and y = y_0. Notice the projection of all other lines into the (x, y)-plane gives us the line y = p_0 x (i.e. the tangent line of all functions that satisfy f(x_0) = y_0, f'(x_0) = p_0). The projection of the line given by x = x_O and y = y_0 into the (x, y)-plane gives us the point (x_0, y_0). If a 1-graph were to be tangent to this line at (x_0, y_0, p_0), then the corresponding function would have a singularity at x_0.

What about when n = 2 or greater?

Think about: What are the dimensions of the integral manifolds (manifolds such that the tangent plane at each of its points is a subspace of the contact plane) for the field of contact planes?

Answer (we take for granted for now): the dimension cannot be greater than half the dimension of the contact plane.

Definition (Legendre manifold): integral sub manifold of a field of contact planes whose dimension is maximal (from above, we know that this would be half the dimension of the contact plane).

Example of Legendre manifold: 1-graphs

Converse is not true: not all Legendre manifolds are 1-graphs.

Example of a Legendre manifold that is not a 1-graph: consider the smooth curve parameterized by x = t^2, y = \frac{2}{3}t^3, p = t. It is easy to check that it satisfies dy = pdx, i.e. this curve is a Legendre manifold. The projection of this curve into the (x,y)-plane is not smooth; we have a cusp singularity at the origin. Hence, this curve is not a 1-graph.

First order PDE’s in J^1(\mathbb{R}^n, \mathbb{R})

Such an equation describes a 2n-dimensional submanifold \Gamma^{2n} in J^1.

Our goal: at each point in \Gamma^{2n}, we want to distinguish a characteristic direction determined by the tangent space of \Gamma^{2n} and the contact structure.

At a point p \in \Gamma^{2n}, we consider the intersection of the tangent space (dim. 2n) and the contact plane (dim. 2n). Since J^1 has dimension 2n+1, it follows that these two spaces either coincide (p is singular) or we have a (2n-1)-dimension intersection ($latex p) is regular).

Claim: for a surface \Gamma in general position, the singular points are isolated.

Proof: In a small neighbourhood, we can describe \Gamma as the zero-set of a function, i.e. \{ x \in J^1: f(x) = 0 \}. Let p be a point in this neighbourhood. Every vector tangent to \Gamma at p is orthogonal to the gradient direction of f, i.e. T_p \Gamma = \text{Ker}(df_p) (or $df_p(v) = 0$ for any v \in T_p \Gamma).

If T_p \Gamma coincides with the contact plane, then \alpha = dy - p \cdot dx vanishes on T_p \Gamma. Hence, we have df_p = \lambda \alpha_p for some \lambda \in \mathbb{R}*.

In local coordinates, \alpha = (1, 0, ...0), and so, if we express df_p = (a_0, a_1, ..., a_{2n}), we have:

a_0 = \lambda

a_1 = 0

…

a_{2n} = 0 (where a_1, ..., a_{2n} are all functions of p)

We have 2n equations in a 2n-dim. manifold. The solution set is 0-dim. Thus, the singular points are isolated.

Leave a Reply

Is this your new site? Log in to activate admin features and dismiss this message
Log In