This post is based upon my reading on the section on exterior forms in Arnold’s Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics.
Let be an n-dim. vector space. We do not fix any special euclidean structure on
.
Definition of 1-form: It is a linear function , i.e.
.
(where ).
The set of all 1-forms from is a vector space, i.e.
(where ).
Claim: the space of 1-forms on is itself n-dimensional. It is called the dual space
.
Given orthogonal coordinates in
, each coordinate
is a 1-form, i.e.
Geometrically, this is the projection of the vector onto the -axis, parallel in the other directions!
Given this basis of ‘s, every 1-form can be expressed as:
The value of on a vector
is:
where is the component of
in the direction of
.
Physical interpretation: let be the displacement vector and
be a uniform force field,
, in
, then
is the work that
does on the displacement
.
Geometric interpretation: is the length of the projection of the vector
onto the subspace spanned by
(this projection is parallel along the other directions
, where
form an orthonormal basis in
).
Definition of 2-form: It is a bilinear and skew symmetric map , i.e.
(where )
Examples of 2-forms:
Example 1: Oriented area of parallelogram in
.
Example 2: Oriented area of the projection of the parallelogram on the plane in
(given the coordinates of
are
)

Note: this is the 2-dimensional version of the projection we saw earlier. It is not difficult to see that the oriented area of the projection of parallelograms onto any plane in (or in fact
) gives us a 2-form, i.e., we can view the 2-forms as the oriented area of projections of 2-dimensional parallelograms onto a 2-dimensional subspace of
(with some choice of unit area)!
Example 3: in 3-dimensional oriented Euclidean space (the orientation gives us the skew-symmetry), the flux of the fluid (described by a constant field, say ) over the area of the parallelogram
given by:
where (
is the unit vector normal to the parallelogram
and obtained from the right-hand rule).
Thinking about: can we interpret every 2 form as the flux of some sort of fluid field across the surface of a parallelogram?
It is now easy to see what means.
Algebraically, it is a k-linear and anti-symmetric function of k vectors:
.
Geometrically, it is the oriented volume of the projections of k-dimensional parallelepiped onto a k-dimensional subspace of (with some choice in the unit volume).
Thus, an n-form in gives us the volume of the parallelpiped up to a choice of unit volume.
Exterior Product of Two 1-forms
Given two 1-forms , the exterior product of these two forms is a 2-form
defined in the most natural way

Algebraically, this is given by:
it is easy to see using the properties of the determinant with respect to its rows that this map is bilinear and skew-symmetric.
Interesting observation: the map is also bilinear and skew-symmetric because the properties of the rows also hold for the columns.
Geometrically: is uniquely determined by vectors
(maybe we can call them the characteristic vectors?). Recall, we can interpret a 1-form as the length of the projection of vectors onto a subspace spanned by another vector, say
. The
are the respective
‘s for
. Notice that
span a 2-dimensional plane.
is the vector obtained from the projection of
onto
-plane, and
is the vector obtained from the projection of
onto
-plane. Thus,
gives us the oriented area of the parallelogram
when projected onto the
-plane!
From this, we can easily derive the algebraic expression as well as the geometric meaning behind the exterior product of k 1-forms.
Leave a Reply